This coming Thursday the NCUA board will review the agency’s midyear budget. To do so thoughtfully, it is useful to put the operating budget’s long term and recent trends in perspective.
Below is a summary of the growth rate of NCUA’s operating fund budget from 1999-2001. The first column shows the compound annual growth (CAGR) for the entire period; the second column for the most recent five years. Note the annual growth rate is per year.
Annual Growth of NCUA’s Operating Fund Expenses (1999-2021)
|Beginning Cash Balance $MN||11.47%||22.43%|
|Operating Fee Receipts $MN||4.27%||8.97%|
|Operating Expenses $MN||3.66%||9.48%|
|Net Fund Bal at Yearend $MN||16.92%||26.01%|
|Ending Cash Balance $MN||12.32%||21.33%|
What the Recent Numbers Mean: Expenses Out of Control
During these 22 years, NCUA has transferred ever higher amounts of its operating expenses to the insurance fund. This is via the Overhead Transfer Rate (OTR) process. That rate of expense allocation has been as low as 52% in 2008 and as high as 73.1% in 2016. Currently it is 62.7% an increase from 2021.
This overhead transfer has exceeded 50% even though state charters have always had fewer than 50% of total insured shares this entire time. NCUA is subsidizing its regulation of federal charters by shifting costs onto state credit unions.
Following this arbitrary, open-ended expense transfer however, operating expenses still increased 3.66% annually or faster than inflation for the entire period. Most recently in the five years 2016-2021 this annual growth accelerated to 9.84 % or three times faster than the overall 22 year average.
NCUA invented inflation five years before the rest of the economy could catch up.
After this OTR allocation, the Operating Fee charged to FCU’s exceeded actual operating expenses by an average of 104.5% for this entire period– some years more than 100% and others less. Since 2015 however, the NCUA’s the operating fee collected has exceeded actual expenses every year.
Building NCUA Cash from Credit Union Funds
The result of these excess fees is that yearend cash on hand has grown from $13 million to $129.6 million (or ten times-1000% ) in this 22 year period. During these same years, while annual expenses grew by just 3.6%, NCUA grew cash balances at 12.3%, or four times as fast.
The 2021 year end cash balance of $129 million was 110% more than that year’s total expenses, and double the 46% average for the entire period.
NCUA held cash balances for the first 16 years of this analysis between 30-40% of the actual expenditures. Since 2016 NCUA has retained more and more credit union funds. Yet there has been no change in either the agency’s ability to assess its fee or in its operations to require this ever growing cash and fund balance.
The Latest Numbers: May 2022
As of end of May, cash balances are $191.8 million slightly higher than 12 months earlier. Operating expenses for the first five months are $48.3 million exactly the same as the prior year.
The net fund balance (equity) is at an all-time high of $141.3 million for this time of year. In 1999 the net fund balance was just $6 million. The numbers and trends suggest that $75 million or more of this excess cash could be returned to credit unions and NCUA still have more than enough to cover all operating expense.
The Board’s Budget Review
American author Edward Abbey observed: “Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell.”
This Thursday if expenses lag budget, the NCUA’s habit is to repurpose unspent funds and/or approve new positions not in the original budget.
Normal business practice would be to reduce the budget, not find new ways to spend a surplus.
How will the board view this ever-growing cash hoard? The traditional government mindset is to spend all the money on hand, whether that is necessary or effective. Staff is always fearful that if money is left over, it will justify reducing the budget request for the following year.
Chairman Harper has been very public in of his ambition to grow staff, the NCUSIF and the budget at every opportunity.
Will the rest of the board go along with this six-year pattern of uncontrolled operating expenses and buildup of excess cash? Or will they stop the spread of NCUA’s operating fund cancer?
After all this is the members’ money.