A Simple Solution for NCUSIF Revenue

At the November NCUA board meeting, two members responding to the NCUSIF update made “the sky is falling” projections about whether the fund will have adequate resources in 2021.

One board member confidently predicted that the assessment of a premium is not a question of if, but when.

Neither forecast was supported by factual analysis.

Relevant Facts

Before offering a simple, immediate solution to these future seers’ concerns it is important to affirm basic facts about the NCUSIF’s financial strength and record.

  • As reported by Chairman Hood to Congress the fund’s NOL is 1.32, which is above the legal cap of 1.3%. Anytime the fund exceeds this cap, a premium cannot be charged.
  • The current NOL is 12 basis points above the 1.20 floor below which a restoration plan must be prepared. This is a financial margin of almost $2 billion.
  • In the last 12 years of operations, the total insurance losses for the entire period Is $1.887 BN or less than the current NOL “surplus” margin.
  • NCUA’s transfer of its fixed operating expenses to the NCUSIF via the overhead transfer rate (OTR) in this same 12 years is $1.968 BN or more than the total insurance losses.
  • NCUSIF’s operating expenses have grown at a CAGR of 8.06% versus the growth of insured shares of only 5.6% in this time span. It is this fixed operating expense, not insurance losses, that eat up the fund’s revenue.
  • The fund’s average insurance 12-year loss is 1.727 of insured savings. This includes the entire years of the Great Recession. The current 12 basis point NOL margin is seven times (700%) this average annual rate of loss.
  • The September 2020 NCUSIF financials show an allowance reserve already funded for both general and specific losses. Moreover, the total assets of all code 4 and 5 credit unions is only .64% of the industry’s assets, that is less than 1%. This is the lowest level in the past decade.

Full details of the NCUSIF’s operations can be found on this spread sheet.

2019 NCUSIF Performance Spreadsheet_AJ1

 

The NCUSIF 1% semi-annual deposit “true up” underwriting means the NCUSIF is entirely countercyclical in its structure. The NOL range of 10 basis points(1.20 to 1.30) provides flexibility no matter the uncertainties that might occur. It is the ever-increasing fixed expense charged the NCUSIF in the OTR, not the variable insurance losses, that take the majority of NCUSIF income.

The fund’s financial architecture has proven its resilience since 1984 a period of time in which the FDIC has gone negative three times. The FSLIC failed and was merged into the FDIC in the 1990’s. In spite of these failures, the FDIC is still based on the same premium financial model that has led to its repeated failure.

A Ready, Easy Source of Additional Revenue-Not Premiums

As of September 30, the market value of the NCUSIF investment portfolio exceeded its book value by $586 million. This is due to the precipitous fall in interest rates engineered by the Federal Reserve at the beginning of March responding to the pandemic and economic shut down.

By selling these securities and staying short, the fund would book immediate revenue in the hundreds of millions, become more liquid and be better positioned for the inevitable rise in rates from present historic lows.

This market premium disappears if the securities are held to maturity. The time to realize this gain is now. It will add immediately to equity if the board truly believes the NCUSIF must sustain an NOL above 1.3. A premium cannot be levied if the NOL is above 1.3%

But what about the future revenue possibly foregone when the bonds are sold and reinvested at today’s lower rates? That is a contingency easily modeled, but ultimately relies on the assumptions made about how long the current rate environment is likely to continue.

The NCUSIF reported the following fixed rate investments by the NCUSIF in September:

Term   Rate
4 yrs    .20%
5 yrs    .27%
6 yrs    .36%
7 yrs     .45%

Is there any CFO or CEO who would make investments for their credit union at these terms and fixed rates into the future? While no one knows the future, the preponderance of experience suggests that it will take only one move by the Fed from its current 0-25 bps overnight range, to a first step raising it to 25-50 bps, for all of these investments to be underwater, that is less than book value.

Yes, there is a risk of some foregone revenue next year, but a reasonable forecast suggests that a strong recovery will bring with it higher rates. And if the opposite happens and economic disaster occurs, then the liquidity would be readily available.

The Action Needed and the Precedent

If the NCUA board decides to keep the NOL above the 1.3% current cap, then sell some of its investments, take the gains and recognize the revenue now. When rates rise, the market premium goes away. This is an opportunity that will decline if not disappear in the not-too-distant future.

The precedent is 2008 when the NCUSIF sold longer term securities to prepare for the potential contingencies brought by the Great Recession. This boosted income so that no premium was necessary with the fund reporting net income of $24 million and an NOL of 1.26.

2 Replies to “A Simple Solution for NCUSIF Revenue”

  1. Chip, You are once again SPOT ON. If any credit union made portfolio investments to wit:
    Term Rate
    4 yrs .20%
    5 yrs .27%
    6 yrs .36%
    7 yrs .45%
    The NCUA ALM Specialist would be all over the credit union like a knife through hot butter. The NCUA Specialist (oxymoron) would in fact would force the credit union to take a loss and liquidate the investments. WHY? Because under a silly 300 basis point rate shock up these would all fail in a miserable way. Even without any rational basis in fact to support such a rate shock the NCUA imposes such arbitrary and capricious shocks to credit union investment portfolios. Again the NCUA instructs those they supervise to “Do as I say, not as I do.” Without any regulatory authority they cite “best practices” to support silly decision making. It’s a fools errand. This is why we left the federal charter for a state charter with private ASI insurance. Escape the cross hairs of the NCUA. The NCUA has outgrown their usefulness. So says this retired credit union CEO.

  2. One more thing while we are on the subject. Having the NCUA manage the NCUSIF is like having the coyote guard the chicken coop. Not a good idea. WHY? When the NCUA exam team goofs off (aka Corporate CU wipe out) they simply cover it up with increased cu assessments, and raises for these incompetent civil servants. Recommendation: The NCUA should contract out management of the NCUSIF to ASI ((American Share Insurance)) a private deposit insurance group with extensive history of prudent share insurance management. ASI sustained no losses during the Corporate CU debacle. If anyone at the NCUA is reading this contact CEO Dennis Adams @ ASI @ (800) 521-6342
    You don’t trust the government with your home our auto or life insurance. Why do you trust them with your deposit insurance?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.