While the administration’s trade policy may have only an indirect impact on credit union fortunes, it is an example of how public policy can become sideways with America’s long term interests. And our standing with the rest of the world.
What follows is a brief critique of the underlying assumptions about tariffs and how the rest of the world will react. The analyst’s point is that poor policy assumptions lead to poor policy outcomes.
Policy is one aspect of the NCUA board’s role. The board no longer exists. Future meetings have been cancelled and/or called tentative.
The board’s statutory role is to manage the agency. That also is on hold.
The consequences of these absences of regulatory oversight will not be known for a while. Meantime some credit unions will take the opportunity to push the envelope on corporate interests.
There will be fallout from this regulatory abdication on policy and agency leadership. Like the trade example below, the market won’t wait to fill the current vacuum in supervision.
The Challenge of False Policy Assumptions
The following summary of US trade strategy is by William Reinsch at the Center for Strategic and International Studies *CSIS).
|