Synopsis: Due to the length of this post, the following is a quick summary of this merger proposal. The five highest paid executives of Member One FCU will receive $570,000 in bonuses; the continuing, Virginia Credit Union, takes over a very sound $1.7 billion balance sheet and adds $155 million new capital to its net worth, and the members receive only free cookies for their 84 year old successful credit union.
![](https://chipfilson.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/E7F9228E-5B41-4DA1-AAF3-91A9C6A70DAC_1_201_a.jpeg)
Tomorrow, July 30, 2024, member voting will end on the proposed merger of Member One FCU in Roanoke, VA with Virginia Credit Union (VACU), in Richmond.
Member One was founded 84 years earlier to serve the employees of the N&W railway headquartered in Roanoke. Today it is a multi-seg charter with $1.65 billion in assets, $1.5 billion in loans, 159,000 members served by 335 FTE’s in fifteen branches. (data as of June 30, 2024)
The members will receive nothing from their $155 million of collective capital (9.57% net worth) and four generations of loyal support.
The Member Notice dated June 13, 2024 confirms that this merger is not about change but rather continuation of the business status quo:
“Same knowledgeable, Friendly Employees”
“ the credit union’s main office and branches will remain open, subject to good practices and safety and soundness.”
“Changes to services and benefits: There are no anticipated changes to core services and member benefits.”
The only advantages referenced in the Notice are general assertions about potential future capabilities which are completely undefined either in time or factually. An example: “we would ultimately gain economies of scale.”
This decision facing members is simply stated by member Carrie Adams on the opposition members’ website:
“Saying “no” to a merger is saying “yes” to the future you believe in.”
The Opposition’s Campaign and Web Site
The member-owners opposing this sale have established a website VoteNoMemberone.org that documents the reasons for their opposition. It includes a countdown clock clicking to the voting deadline tomorrow, Tuesday. It urges members to vote No.
The basis for their opposition is summarized in six points:
- There is No Real Benefit for Members
- This is Bad for the Roanoke Valley
- VACU is only after the numbers
- Different Culture, Different Fees
- You will become a number, not a Member
- You are NOT being communicated with
In the Your Voice Heard portion of the site, members’ comments document these statements. In the almost 100 posts one quickly senses there is nothing to be gained and much to be lost in this betrayal of members’ trust. Here are some examples of members and the community “being left in the dark:”
I had no idea! Thanks for the information about the credit union, brings a light to us members being left out in the dark.
I sent Member One some feedback through their website and had asked some questions, expecting to hopefully get a response. I did. I got a canned response asking for my information to contact me rather than just answering my questions through their email response. . .
We can say goodbye to the hometown feeling of being a valued member to becoming just a number.
Yet another local business being bought out by a BIG City Business. The only notice we got about the merger was a tv news report, so if you didn’t see the news or a friend tell you about it, you would never have known. They did not even send out an email notification or a notification with our statement. What the hell are you hiding Member One???
The proposed transaction announced in January 2024 is already hurting Member One’s local business reputation:
Just recently I was looking to move and purchase a home. When I talked to my realtor about financing the mortgage; I had planned on using Member One since I had loans with them in the past. My realtor told me they were not using Member One for any mortgage financing since they had announced the merger because of the uncertainty of they stability at this time. They also said they knew of other realtors not using Member One for the same reasons.
Freedom First is now charging for checking, I started to look at Member One, but seeing they are getting eaten by a larger credit union, I went in a different direction
I work for a local car dealership and found out that VACU doesn’t operate loans on Saturdays, thats going to hurt a lot of local business if we can’t get autoloans approved like they currently are at Member One.
Members’ Voices Amplified
The posts in the Member Voices portion of the website also contains comments from insiders, current and former employees:
I am currently an employee at MO at a branch and wish to remain nameless for fear of retaliation. VACU’s goal is to be a $10b CU within the next 5-6 years. MO is just a ‘cog’ in the wheel and there is no true benefit to merging for MO members. . .
Truthfully, there will be people let go at some point b/c of redundancy, while nothing will change at first, by Operational Day 1 in late 2025 or 2026, you will likely see fees change, call center moved to the one in Richmond.
And: As a former employee of MO, I recall discussions about a $10 billion deal some time ago. Initially promoted as ‘better together,’ the attitude shifted within weeks to a rush mentality focused on pushing through the merger, resembling more of a takeover than a mutually agreed merger. After getting ‘bad vibes’ from that, I left the company.
The opposition has been reported in a story on the local news radio WFIR July 24. The report opens with concern about Roanoke losing another local company through this “sell off.” The credit union spokesperson replies that this is a merger of “two very healthy organizations” and that “bigger will be better” in responing to members’ criticisms.
Researching Virginia Credit Union’s Online Reputation
The opponents’ site provides links to multiple social media and other posts in a section called VACU Reviews And Information. These 12 links include VACU’s own mobile app with 177 reviews and a rating of 2.6 out of 5. Other sites such as Facebook, Yelp (2.2 score from 17 reviews) and Grassroots (3.5 score and 18% approve of CEO) all have similar low evaluations or scores of VACU’s services.
Needless to say, none of this rating information was provided to Member One voters being asked to transfer their future and all their collective resources to this new institution. One wonders if there was any due diligence by the executives and board of the credit union.
So Why is This Merger Happening?
One member posed this question in a comment: Why would our local credit union allow an outside credit union buy them out?
Two members posted their conclusions referring to the Member Special MeetingNotice:
I read the top brass gets a big payout if the merger goes through. . .
Wow, looks like the c-suite gets a nice ‘bonus’, I bet other employees won’t see anything in the way of retention or bonus pay.
These comments refer to the $575,000 in bonuses ($250,000 to Frank Carter, CEO) listed for the five most highly compensated employees in the credit union in the Notice.
One member noted: The “incentives to stay” at the end of the meeting Notice seem extraordinary – why is such an incentive needed? There would certainly be others available to hire who are well qualified should these people choose not to stay. Well more than a half million dollars is being promised to these five individuals! That amount would best serve members in so many other ways. . .
Incomplete Information
But even this disclosure is incomplete and therefore misleading. NCUA rules require that members be provided a “detailed description of all merger related financial arrangements. This description must include recipient’s name and title as well as at a minimum, the amount of value of the merger-related financial arrangement expressed, where possible, as a dollar figure.” CFR $ 708b.106(b)(4)(v).
There is no disclosure of any contractual employment terms suggesting that these five are “at will” employees even though the Notice clearly states a bonus commitment and conditions. It would be highly unusual for senior executives not to have a written contract from their new employer, with their bonus benefits and future employment after the merger. Those facts must be disclosed under the rule.
Secondly, Member One’s call reports list a Select Employee Retirement Plan (SERP) valued at $15.5 million and an employee life insurance fund valued at $16.5 million-a total of $32 million in benefits. These plans’ vesting and/or payout terms will activate when Member One ceases to exist or under “change of control” clauses. These changes in payment terms due to the merger were not disclosed.
This total compensation information is critical. CEO and executive pay is readily available from the IRS 990 Form filed by Virginia Credit Union (VACU), as a state charter. While an excerpt is printed in the website’s VACU Information section from CAUSE IQ, those totals are incomplete when the full VACU 990 for 2022 is analyzed.
That report’s 2022 Schedule J shows VACU’s CEOs total compensation as $2.216 million. The top eight employees received $7.4 million in total or an average of $917,265 each (the top two received almost 50% of the amount). VACU’s compensation approach from IRS 990 schedule O clearly states the credit union “has a compensation philosophy of paying salaries and benefits that are competitive with . . .peers in the credit union and financial industries (banks).”
As stated in the Notice, VACU CEO Chris Shockley will be President/CEO of the combined credit union. Certainly his more recent compensation is relevant to Member One’s member-owner’s vote.
Transparency is critical for informed decisions as well as preventing self-dealing. Member One owners should know what their leaders who made these decisions are paid now and promised in the future. In addition to disclosing all self-interest there is another critical factor from this information. Such data points to the character of the arrangers for this transaction.
The Values Questions
Is 2022 CEO Shockley’s total compensation of $2.2 million is almost double the amount of the total of all 18 community grants and donations made by his credit union in the same year of $1.22 million. The phrase that “charity begins at home” would seem apt when it comes to how the leadership of VACU distributes net revenue between executives and the members in the community.
This example provides insight into one of the benefits asserted in the Member Notice that “this merger will combine two established entities that share similar values and commitments to their members, people and culture.” It raises the question of what due diligence Member One Board chair Joesph Hopkins reviewed when signing this member Notice. Or do these two boards’ understanding of fiduciary duty to members and the community only arise after their executives ambitions have been fully satisfied?
VACU has received publicity before about its implementation of coop democratic values. In two posts The Fix is In and We Own VACU members’ frustration in being totally ignored when submitting nominations for four board seats is described. Member voting for directors is not the the standard VACU election process; rather the nomination committee only selects the number of their preferred candidates equal to the open seats, no outside nominations considered. All chosen then confirmed by acclamation.
A Perpetual Coop Model?
One other perspective on the credit union model which is designed to be perpetual by paying members collective wealth forward to benefit future generations.
Member One is 84 years young in 2024. The two senior executives, CEO Frank Carter mad EVP Jean Hopstetter joined in 2008, or 16 years ago. These two leaders have had their roles for less than 20% of the credit union’s history.
However their legacy is to end the credit union’s charter and turn its future over to a third party. This is not succession planning failure. Rather it is pulling up the ladder of opportunity so no one else will have the professional leadership and financial chances they have enjoyed.
The Consequences for the Cooperative System
As in other manipulated, self-serving mergers powered by self-interest, what happens in Roanoke will not stay in Roanoke. VACU’s minuscule $575,000 personal payments to five Member One executives to acquire $155 million in equity and a $1.7 billion sound balance sheet will not go unnoticed.
This equity capital addition is vital to VACU as it reports a loss on the market value of its own investments of $153 million at March 2024. The same FASB 115 adjustment for Member One is zero.
The absence of any pretense of due diligence by Member One’s board and senior executives, the alienation of the members and Roanoke business community and the compromise of the values credit unions are supposed to reflect will resonate throughout the coop system and in political capitals locally and nationally.
Instead of credit union members being paid the full value of their ownership, a small number of executives will see the chance to cash out, to sell out the members, their community and the coop system. VACU executives know the market value of what they are being gifted as they compare their performance with banks. No other financial firm would ever propose such a deal to their owners-only a misguided credit union board. This backroom deal is the stuff of cutthroat capitalism, not cooperative purpose.
Where is NCUA?
The agency is fully aware of these events but have neither the courage or convictions to implement their own merger rules.
All three board members love to debate diversity, equity and inclusion. Only equity has no real application in practice. Equity’s traditional understanding of fairness, transparency and equal opportunity has just become another form of virtue signaling.
When board members have have no vision for either cooperatives or for principled leadership, a certain segment in credit unions quickly learns that they can game the system for personal advantage.
If this seems like a harsh judgement, I challenge each board member and their senior staff to read the four page member notice in this case. Then ask if they truly believe that the information presented is sufficient for any member, let alone an engaged analyst, to determine if this is a fair deal for the owners.
The basic regulatory approved disclosure document provided members is nothing more than marketing rhetorical phrases filling out NCUA approved forms. There is no relevant information or facts to make an informed decision. No other state or federal financial regulator would ever accept this superficial disclosure as adequate for owners’ deliberations.
I give the final assessment of this ongoing credit union system failing to a member. This person sees clearly what any concerned credit union leader would recognize instantly about this so-called merger proposal. This common sense wisdom puts to shame the actions and inactions of the movers and approvers of this event:
I’m advocating for a “no” vote on the credit union merger because it’s crucial to preserve our community’s values and personalized service. Our credit union has thrived on being member-focused, providing tailored financial solutions and fostering a strong sense of community involvement.
A merger could jeopardize these qualities by potentially changing fees, terms, and services in ways that might not align with our original values. Maintaining our independence also ensures we retain decision-making power and governance autonomy, which are vital for keeping our institution accountable and responsive to our members’ needs.
Voting against the merger is about safeguarding what makes our credit union special and ensuring it continues to serve our community with integrity and dedication.
Amen
A note from IRS 990 Schedule O for 2022 stating VACU’s compensation philosophy:
PERIODICALLY, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ENGAGES AN OUTSIDE CONSULTANT TO CONDUCT AN INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS TO ENSURE THE APPROPRIATENESS OF TOTAL COMPENSATION LEVELS.
THIS EVALUATION LOOKS AT THE AVERAGE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS OF EXECUTIVES AT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS OF COMPARABLE SIZE, INCLUDING BANKS AND CREDIT UNIONS. THIS PHILOSOPHY RECOGNIZES THAT THE EXTENT TO WHICH WE ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN THIS GOAL MUST BE BALANCED WITH THE OVERALL FINANCIAL HEALTH OF THE ORGANIZATION.
THE CREDIT UNION HAS A COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY OF PAYING SALARIES AND BENEFITS THAT ARE COMPETITIVE WITH EMPLOYERS IN THE SURROUNDING METROPOLITAN AREAS AND WITH PEERS IN THE CREDIT UNION AND FINANCIAL INDUSTRIES.
ANNUALLY, EMPLOYEES RECEIVE PERFORMANCE REVIEWS WHICH DETERMINE MERIT INCREASES. THE PRESIDENT/CEO COMPENSATION IS APPROVED BY THE BOARD EVERY YEAR.